The matrimonial agreement has long been considered valid in many countries, including France, Belgium, Finland and Norway, Asian countries such as Thailand and North American countries such as the United States and Canada. In Nigeria, the implementation of the spy agreement remains a relatively new approach, which is not yet widespread.  Since the court does not question the post-marriage agreements reached during the proceedings, couples are advised to enter into such agreements in order to avoid lengthy and costly divorce proceedings. However, prenups are more beneficial because at the time of contraction, the same emotional and sentimental feelings of injury that would normally be on the way to the post-marital arrangement would be missing. Experience shows that the parties almost no longer agree on anything after adultery. Each class of people can instruct their lawyer to create a prenup. This is due to the reasons given by Ahmed and Jumoke, up to the transfer of the children`s property, the separation of premarital debts, etc. As with another contract, it is essential to obtain strong legal aid. Since prenups should not be used as an instrument of coercion or a mechanism by both parties, courts have always had the final say on the contractual terms and conditions required when challenged.
For example, in the event of an objection or infringement, “agreements” concluded under a compulsive part will not be subject to judicial review. Like Ahmed and Jumoke, spouses who intend to have an agreement on religious indoctrination to be given to children or the preference of both parties to establish distant relationships. However, this type of problem is not easy to assess and, therefore, there may not be appropriate problems that can be solved in a prenup. In Nigeria, while the parties are free to enter into contracts, we draw on existing statutes and jurisprudence on the issues that may arise during presidencies. The Court intends to issue a preliminary decision taking into account the general interest of the child, particularly with regard to the imposition of physical and/or legal custody of the child. Therefore, while the parties may have agreed that in the event of divorce, custody belongs to a party, it is the duty of the Court to determine who will have custody if the circumstances and circumstances that affect the best interests of the child prevail. The husband and wife may be entitled to equal custody, provided they can prove that they are caring for the child. The issue of custody of the children was tried in the case of the woman.