[Who/what is washed? –> “hands.” “Hands” is the direct object and is placed according to the verb, disagree.] For some verbs, the Past Participant must agree on sex and number, either with the subject or with the subject of the sentence. This agreement is necessary in the following situations: 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, since the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the half-relief. So here is the rule of the past composed with agreement: in this case you will always use “bere”, but there will be no agreement: not with the subject, not with the direct object… – However, there is still the possibility of the direct object agreement, as after the 31.2 above. Students spend hours understanding chords with compound past. However, if you learn French to communicate in French, all these agreements are silent most of the time! It is only in writing that it counts. Being with like your auxiliary adverb is pretty simple. Current participants will have the same type of agreements as the regular French adjective. Of course, if the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, this pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with it. However, as the direct object precedes the verb, past participation is subject to a direct object agreement. A form of verb composed of an auxiliary verb and a main verb is called in grammar as a composite tension, unlike a simple form that uses only the main verb.
A lot of people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and discuss on Facebook: if there is a direct object that is the recipient of the action, then the rules of agreement are the same as in have: the previous participant agrees with the direct object when placed in front of the verb and disagrees if placed after. But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. Pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement.